![]() |
"The twist is continued below by a five strand cable twist..." Harper's, February 1855. |
Here's the other five-strand plait I've found: a five-strand cable twist. To be fair, the only reference I've seen to this twist is in the Harper's illustration above. Except for the instructions, which call for three strands, I've found no other references to cable twists/plaits/braids which say how many to use. This leads me to suspect that three-strand cable twists are the default, but the evidence isn't concrete. At least one source uses "rope" for the two-strand version, but there may be come overlap between cable and rope twists.
To review, the three-strand cable plait is slight variation on a basic flat three strand braid: the right-hand strand goes over the center, but instead of staying there, it loops around the center strand and goes back to the right side; the left likewise goes around the center and back home.
Transforming that into a five strand, the key attributes seem to be:
- Center strand (probably) stays put
- The moving strand returns to its general area
- Strands need to advance
First method attempted: Far left strand goes over less-far-left and center, around the center and into the less-far-left position. The center strand stays in the center, while the former less-far-left strand advances to the far-left position. Repeat with the right. Then the left again. This is the most straightforward and most similar to the 3-strand, so it's my preferred option.
![]() |
The active strand going over its neighbor and the center strand. |
![]() |
Continue advancing: over 2 and back under the center, then repeat from the other side. |
![]() |
This five-strand cable plait is round, but looks an awful lot like the three-strand version. |
Second hypothetical method: As the first, but with the moving strand goes over the three middle strands instead of just two. That's over three, around the far two, and back to the position next to where it started. This one was really hard to keep the strands separated, and ends up being a more complicated way to achieve the same effect as the first one.
![]() |
I can't tell them apart, but #2 was a lot more annoying to make. |
![]() |
The first method looks like a cable, but the third just looks like the flat 5-strand braid. |